<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mondo 2000: Where Are they Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/</link>
	<description>Coilhouse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: magdalen</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12740</link>
		<dc:creator>magdalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-12740</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s tres heartening to read people&#039;s comments (hey joshua, whaddup). mondo changed my life, too, but i eventually realized why: i grew up reading Mad magazine. lots of Mad magazine. so to me, everything is real, but it&#039;s a joke, and parody is the best, and the way to make reality is to invent some wacky-ass thing and write about it as though it were real, and and and.

Mondo seemed to have that sense of humor down, and that flair for pranksterism and messing with people&#039;s minds and media. when i met people there and played page five girl for Bart Nagel, and wrote for mondo, and got certain completely untrue/hilarious things mentioned in the magazine, all my amusement seemed well founded.

on the other hand, m2k DID inspire some earnest post-60s let&#039;s-fuck-shit-upness, by combining reality with made up stuff and far out stuff. fabulous.

Wired (and yes, i eventually broke down and wrote for them a bunch of times) was a slap in the face, at first. they seemed to plunder the mondo aesthetic and the various cyberdelic weirdnesses going on at the time, and use them in the service of ... ugh... business. oh well. Wired lasted. mondo didn&#039;t. that&#039;s how these things work. 

back in the proverbial day, i recall we thought we would Change the World with this magical thing called the Internet. we would overhaul democracy (in addition to doing a lot of drugs and watching robots annihilate each other). it would all be great.

interesting thought that is, now.

other zines in the mondosphere: gareth branwyn&#039;s excellent print zine Going Gaga. paco xander nathan &amp; jon lebkowsky &amp; me &amp; wiley wiggins &amp; everybody&#039;s Fringe Ware Review. (erika whiteway &amp; i guest edited an issue on &quot;chicks in cyberspace&quot; beginning in 1993. fifteen years later, even girls have email! o the shock!) Plazm started at that same time, too -- now i&#039;m an editor there. boing boing, too, of course. and many of these folks were influenced by the Whole Earth Review, Co Evolutionary Quarterly, and its evil digital spawn, The WELL. (where, dinosaurette that i am, i still hang out. lots.)

sorry i&#039;m kind of sick &amp; incoherent. i should shaddup. glad the mondo conversation is rolling, though.

HOW DAFT ARE YOU?
HOW TENSE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s tres heartening to read people&#8217;s comments (hey joshua, whaddup). mondo changed my life, too, but i eventually realized why: i grew up reading Mad magazine. lots of Mad magazine. so to me, everything is real, but it&#8217;s a joke, and parody is the best, and the way to make reality is to invent some wacky-ass thing and write about it as though it were real, and and and.</p>
<p>Mondo seemed to have that sense of humor down, and that flair for pranksterism and messing with people&#8217;s minds and media. when i met people there and played page five girl for Bart Nagel, and wrote for mondo, and got certain completely untrue/hilarious things mentioned in the magazine, all my amusement seemed well founded.</p>
<p>on the other hand, m2k DID inspire some earnest post-60s let&#8217;s-fuck-shit-upness, by combining reality with made up stuff and far out stuff. fabulous.</p>
<p>Wired (and yes, i eventually broke down and wrote for them a bunch of times) was a slap in the face, at first. they seemed to plunder the mondo aesthetic and the various cyberdelic weirdnesses going on at the time, and use them in the service of &#8230; ugh&#8230; business. oh well. Wired lasted. mondo didn&#8217;t. that&#8217;s how these things work. </p>
<p>back in the proverbial day, i recall we thought we would Change the World with this magical thing called the Internet. we would overhaul democracy (in addition to doing a lot of drugs and watching robots annihilate each other). it would all be great.</p>
<p>interesting thought that is, now.</p>
<p>other zines in the mondosphere: gareth branwyn&#8217;s excellent print zine Going Gaga. paco xander nathan &amp; jon lebkowsky &amp; me &amp; wiley wiggins &amp; everybody&#8217;s Fringe Ware Review. (erika whiteway &amp; i guest edited an issue on &#8220;chicks in cyberspace&#8221; beginning in 1993. fifteen years later, even girls have email! o the shock!) Plazm started at that same time, too &#8212; now i&#8217;m an editor there. boing boing, too, of course. and many of these folks were influenced by the Whole Earth Review, Co Evolutionary Quarterly, and its evil digital spawn, The WELL. (where, dinosaurette that i am, i still hang out. lots.)</p>
<p>sorry i&#8217;m kind of sick &amp; incoherent. i should shaddup. glad the mondo conversation is rolling, though.</p>
<p>HOW DAFT ARE YOU?<br />
HOW TENSE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mer</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-12459</guid>
		<description>Yes! Yay!  Actually, our friend Joshua Ellis conducted a fascinating interview with Sirius that&#039;s just been published in Issue 02 of Coilhouse quarterly. Sirius talks about H+ and Mondo and other stuff. One of my fave articles in the mag!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! Yay!  Actually, our friend Joshua Ellis conducted a fascinating interview with Sirius that&#8217;s just been published in Issue 02 of Coilhouse quarterly. Sirius talks about H+ and Mondo and other stuff. One of my fave articles in the mag!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Grayson - GigantiCo</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12457</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Grayson - GigantiCo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-12457</guid>
		<description>This looks like the perfect place to mention that Ken Goffman (aka. RU Sirius) has a new venture. A transhumanist publication called H+ that can be downloaded for free as a PDF from their website at:

http://www.hplusmagazine.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like the perfect place to mention that Ken Goffman (aka. RU Sirius) has a new venture. A transhumanist publication called H+ that can be downloaded for free as a PDF from their website at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hplusmagazine.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grendelkhan</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4068</link>
		<dc:creator>grendelkhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 06:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-4068</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Joshua Ellis&lt;/b&gt;: [Jude Milhon] was the first female hacker, though, if you don’t count Ada Byron.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Jude Milhon started programming in 1967. Grace Hopper started working on the Harvard Mark I in 1943. Jean Sammet was teaching graduate courses in programming in 1956. Frances Allen joined IBM in 1957.

Either you&#039;re terribly prone to hyperbole, or when you say &quot;hacker&quot;, you mean someone involved in hacker fandom, rather than someone involved in deep dorkery proper. (The sets are by no means non-overlapping, but the first makes me think more of Eric Raymond, and the second of Larry Wall or Donald Knuth.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>Joshua Ellis</b>: [Jude Milhon] was the first female hacker, though, if you don’t count Ada Byron.</p></blockquote>
<p> Jude Milhon started programming in 1967. Grace Hopper started working on the Harvard Mark I in 1943. Jean Sammet was teaching graduate courses in programming in 1956. Frances Allen joined IBM in 1957.</p>
<p>Either you&#8217;re terribly prone to hyperbole, or when you say &#8220;hacker&#8221;, you mean someone involved in hacker fandom, rather than someone involved in deep dorkery proper. (The sets are by no means non-overlapping, but the first makes me think more of Eric Raymond, and the second of Larry Wall or Donald Knuth.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiadist</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-3836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiadist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-3836</guid>
		<description>@nadyalev, Joshua:  Thanks for the insights and (partial) reassurance.   I do suspect that once &quot;we&quot; (or whoever are ready to play the proper role) get the hang ofthe various tools at our disposal, including, I suspect, marketing/rhetoric (a/k/a &quot;memetics&quot;) we may yet see the whole buggy start to rock...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nadyalev, Joshua:  Thanks for the insights and (partial) reassurance.   I do suspect that once &#8220;we&#8221; (or whoever are ready to play the proper role) get the hang ofthe various tools at our disposal, including, I suspect, marketing/rhetoric (a/k/a &#8220;memetics&#8221;) we may yet see the whole buggy start to rock&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadyalev</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>nadyalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Joshua, I couldn&#039;t agree more. The mainstream media has managed to attach an amazing level of stigma concepts like &quot;activism&quot; and &quot;forming a movement.&quot; It&#039;s really sad but at least people are starting to turn around and see that this has happened - or so I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. The mainstream media has managed to attach an amazing level of stigma concepts like &#8220;activism&#8221; and &#8220;forming a movement.&#8221; It&#8217;s really sad but at least people are starting to turn around and see that this has happened &#8211; or so I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Ellis</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-584</guid>
		<description>@EO: While there were certainly a lot of weird trustafarians and other rich weirdos involved, there was also a certain Promethean impulse within M2K, bringing the benefits of high tech out of the labs and industrial parks and into the streets. As for self-important...I dunno. I think what they (we) did *was* pretty important, even if the benefits will only be seen in the long term.

@Jeremiadist: You know, I was watching a Bill Hicks DVD yesterday morning and thinking the same thing...what happened? I think the answer is that we decided as a collective of culture that earnestness and revolution were, on some level, embarrassing. Better to set back and snipe from the cheap seats, which is so much of modern culture, rather than throwing your towel into the ring. Again, this is why everyone is so in love with metaculture: it&#039;s all just trainspotting and talking about someone else&#039;s better ideas.

I&#039;m utterly bored of the sly cultural commentary that passes for discourse in most of the blogosphere. Quit talking about everybody else and make up your own culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@EO: While there were certainly a lot of weird trustafarians and other rich weirdos involved, there was also a certain Promethean impulse within M2K, bringing the benefits of high tech out of the labs and industrial parks and into the streets. As for self-important&#8230;I dunno. I think what they (we) did *was* pretty important, even if the benefits will only be seen in the long term.</p>
<p>@Jeremiadist: You know, I was watching a Bill Hicks DVD yesterday morning and thinking the same thing&#8230;what happened? I think the answer is that we decided as a collective of culture that earnestness and revolution were, on some level, embarrassing. Better to set back and snipe from the cheap seats, which is so much of modern culture, rather than throwing your towel into the ring. Again, this is why everyone is so in love with metaculture: it&#8217;s all just trainspotting and talking about someone else&#8217;s better ideas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m utterly bored of the sly cultural commentary that passes for discourse in most of the blogosphere. Quit talking about everybody else and make up your own culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadyalev</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>nadyalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 07:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>@ EO: I read the whole thing, and I fucking died! It was so funny. &quot;We&#039;re at the beginning of a cultural explosion that&#039;s gonna make the sixties look like a fart in a hurricane!&quot; &quot;Aren&#039;t you having cyberfun? Aren&#039;t you having the cybertime of your cyberlife? HUH?&quot; Thanks for sending it our way.

@ Jeremiadist: I agree that 9/11 has ruined things for everyone. We&#039;ve become a much more conservative nation since then. However I still think that we&#039;re living in a great time today, as far as the concepts mentioned in your last sentence go. Don&#039;t take teh intrawebz for granted!

@ Joshua: I like your comparison of Mondo/Wired as Dionysian/Appolonian. That hits the nail right on the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ EO: I read the whole thing, and I fucking died! It was so funny. &#8220;We&#8217;re at the beginning of a cultural explosion that&#8217;s gonna make the sixties look like a fart in a hurricane!&#8221; &#8220;Aren&#8217;t you having cyberfun? Aren&#8217;t you having the cybertime of your cyberlife? HUH?&#8221; Thanks for sending it our way.</p>
<p>@ Jeremiadist: I agree that 9/11 has ruined things for everyone. We&#8217;ve become a much more conservative nation since then. However I still think that we&#8217;re living in a great time today, as far as the concepts mentioned in your last sentence go. Don&#8217;t take teh intrawebz for granted!</p>
<p>@ Joshua: I like your comparison of Mondo/Wired as Dionysian/Appolonian. That hits the nail right on the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiadist</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiadist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>I think what keeps Mondo 2000 bright in our memories (and very distinct from such useful, but limited publications as Wired) was that it came out of a thorough and consistent point of view that encompassed culture, religion, politics, technology...  and which most of the readers shared before the found their first issue.  It was great to have our fondest convictions touted openly in what looked like a major media outlet - it made it easy to believe the culture was about to be re-engineered for the better.  After all, with such a huge media footprint, how could &quot;we&quot; not be a major force in the world?  In my memory, this is linked with the massive anti-corporate protests that were happening EVERYWHERE, and which dwarfed even those of the sixties.  And then 9/11 happened and it all went to shit.  There&#039;s an obvious MemeWar happening on the net now, but I&#039;m not convinced &quot;we&quot; are winning.  Maybe it&#039;s just that I was of a proper age for such things, but from the late eighties up to the turn of the century, it seemed as if we were advancing liberty, dispelling illusions, debunking false prophets, developing new (mostly online) tools for undermining authority...  what happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what keeps Mondo 2000 bright in our memories (and very distinct from such useful, but limited publications as Wired) was that it came out of a thorough and consistent point of view that encompassed culture, religion, politics, technology&#8230;  and which most of the readers shared before the found their first issue.  It was great to have our fondest convictions touted openly in what looked like a major media outlet &#8211; it made it easy to believe the culture was about to be re-engineered for the better.  After all, with such a huge media footprint, how could &#8220;we&#8221; not be a major force in the world?  In my memory, this is linked with the massive anti-corporate protests that were happening EVERYWHERE, and which dwarfed even those of the sixties.  And then 9/11 happened and it all went to shit.  There&#8217;s an obvious MemeWar happening on the net now, but I&#8217;m not convinced &#8220;we&#8221; are winning.  Maybe it&#8217;s just that I was of a proper age for such things, but from the late eighties up to the turn of the century, it seemed as if we were advancing liberty, dispelling illusions, debunking false prophets, developing new (mostly online) tools for undermining authority&#8230;  what happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eo</title>
		<link>http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>eo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilhouse.net/2007/10/20/mondo-2000-where-are-they-now/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>The best look at the M2K era is Patrick Farley&#039;s classic webcomic, &quot;The Guy I Almost Was&quot; ( http://www.e-sheep.com/almostguy/ )

M2K, while sometimes entertaining, was just another way to sell things to self-important rich people who wanted to feel like they were on the cutting edge. Meh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best look at the M2K era is Patrick Farley&#8217;s classic webcomic, &#8220;The Guy I Almost Was&#8221; ( <a href="http://www.e-sheep.com/almostguy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.e-sheep.com/almostguy/</a> )</p>
<p>M2K, while sometimes entertaining, was just another way to sell things to self-important rich people who wanted to feel like they were on the cutting edge. Meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
