Comments on: Weekly Ad Uncoiling: Which Visual is Wronger?

By: Ben

Ben — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:18:54 +0000

On the subject of “Love’s Baby Soft”, I think we have a “Myopia” problem: We’re looking at this through 2008 eyes. Back when that ad was out there, I’m thinking, like 1973, we had never even HEARD of a pedophile, Amber alerts meant the light was going to change, and we SURE as hell didn’t have millions of morons wandering around with handheld devices clicking off 140 character messages to one another. There were a few “chester the molesters” out there, but they didn’t seem to be everywhere. This is also right after the “hippie” craze, and this form of “innocence” was still thought of as flower-girl ish. So the ad, wrong as it would be NOW, was appropriate and successful – THEN. Take me back to the seventies. At least I’d have a GOOD job…

By: Kazeltjf

Kazeltjf — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:13:47 +0000

Hi!dbps! http://rhjpbmlb.com ymfbt xecwj

By: Elana Bowman

Elana Bowman — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:44:42 +0000

I’m going with the first ad, it’s a human woman washing her face in a toilet.

The blow up dog thing is sick advertising actually in a funny way. Scary

But even worse was the little? girl and the tag line because innocence is sexier than you think. Directed at pedophiles and rapists.

By: Kale Kip

Kale Kip — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:56:01 +0000

The toilet one is pretty insane, but the dog…well.. that is the kind of stuff that wants me to buy a trenchcoat and a shitload of weapons, butcher the personnel of a medium size advertising agency and write a completely disturbed yet catchy slogan on the wall with the blood of some copywriter right before I blow my brains out. Thank god I’m not creative.

By: Aspasia

Aspasia — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:11:40 +0000

Oh dear GOD! The dog! The dog! That thing hurt my soul. Then Seth goes and points out that the ears are actually hand holds and the ad just got 1000% wronger after that. So, so wrong…

By: Jessica

Jessica — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:07:22 +0000

Pervy Doggie is BRILLIANT! That made my day.

By: six06

six06 — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 06:20:45 +0000

hahahaha! the “adult” ad kills me. it’s a historical case of ENGRISH.

By: Seth

Seth — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:21:17 +0000

Dog, no contest.

Why? Because those aren’t just EARS. Those are HAND-HOLDS, for better grip.

Someone actually took the time to design hand-holds on a dog sex doll.

No wonder our species can’t figure out how to solve world hunger.

By: plattdujour

plattdujour — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:19:54 +0000

Oh, I think you should all get out a bit more, dears. I’ve been washing my face in the toilet for years and my complexion is like a baby’s bottom, unwiped of course. And the dog? Since buying one I can’t live without my little Spot, frankly. How can you say it’s wrong? You didn’t notice that she’s a bitch?

By: Skerror

Skerror — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:02:07 +0000

I’m disturbed by the size of that toilet. There’s some junk in that trunk.