Comments on: The Photographs of Roksana Mical http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/ Coilhouse Wed, 23 May 2012 21:15:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Inspiration: Roksana Mical « Amy Ferguson http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/comment-page-1/#comment-22924 Inspiration: Roksana Mical « Amy Ferguson Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:38:07 +0000 http://coilhouse.net/?p=10475#comment-22924 [...] spotted this series of Roksana Mical’s work on Coilhouse. Both images are from the series ‘Marcell’. I think they have a great feel to them as [...] [...] spotted this series of Roksana Mical’s work on Coilhouse. Both images are from the series ‘Marcell’. I think they have a great feel to them as [...]

]]> By: lizzelizzel http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/comment-page-1/#comment-22852 lizzelizzel Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:16:15 +0000 http://coilhouse.net/?p=10475#comment-22852 Nothing gives me a chill like a Plague Doctor wandering the woods. Nothing gives me a chill like a Plague Doctor wandering the woods.

]]> By: Ross Rosenberg http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/comment-page-1/#comment-22846 Ross Rosenberg Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:30:27 +0000 http://coilhouse.net/?p=10475#comment-22846 No I, indeed, saw this on Suzanne's blog and even had the link in one of my drafts. Somewhere during my disjointed and backwards editing cycle I must have deleted it. It has been fixed. Sorry about that Suzanne, it will not happen again. No I, indeed, saw this on Suzanne’s blog and even had the link in one of my drafts. Somewhere during my disjointed and backwards editing cycle I must have deleted it. It has been fixed. Sorry about that Suzanne, it will not happen again.

]]> By: Mer http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/comment-page-1/#comment-22833 Mer Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:35:14 +0000 http://coilhouse.net/?p=10475#comment-22833 "We all appreciate Wurzeltod tremendously here. If we ever posted any art in the past that you posted first without a linback to you, I hope you know that it wasn’t malicious. It was either an oversight, or we simply didn’t know that it was you." Or maybe we saw it somewhere else completely unrelated. Hey, it happens! But in any case, we've been singing your praises from the get-go over here, dear. “We all appreciate Wurzeltod tremendously here. If we ever posted any art in the past that you posted first without a linback to you, I hope you know that it wasn’t malicious. It was either an oversight, or we simply didn’t know that it was you.”

Or maybe we saw it somewhere else completely unrelated. Hey, it happens!

But in any case, we’ve been singing your praises from the get-go over here, dear.

]]> By: Nadya http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/comment-page-1/#comment-22831 Nadya Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:08:59 +0000 http://coilhouse.net/?p=10475#comment-22831 Ack - no via! Most of the time, we definitely include one. I'm sure that Ross, who usually includes a "via" at the bottom of his art posts, simply forgot in this case. I'm sure he'll fix it when he sees the comments, linking back to wherever he happened to find them, if he remembers. If not... we're ripping out his adenoids.* We all consider it very important to link to the original source. Unfortunately, sometimes the source can fall through the cracks. There's a great discussion on how that can happen, and how important it is to us to link to the right source, in the comment thread on this post (Wurzeltod comes up a lot!): http://coilhouse.net/2009/04/pleasures-of-the-flesh-fernando-vicente/ We all appreciate Wurzeltod tremendously here. If we ever posted any art in the past that you posted first without a linback to you, I hope you know that it wasn't malicious. It was either an oversight, or we simply didn't know that it was you. Your site is a treasure trove of inspiration that comes from a very unique perspective. We'd never intentionally obscure such an incredible source. CH <3 SG *Fact: this was actually done to me at a children's hospital in the USSR. Without anesthesia. :( Ack – no via! Most of the time, we definitely include one. I’m sure that Ross, who usually includes a “via” at the bottom of his art posts, simply forgot in this case. I’m sure he’ll fix it when he sees the comments, linking back to wherever he happened to find them, if he remembers. If not… we’re ripping out his adenoids.*

We all consider it very important to link to the original source. Unfortunately, sometimes the source can fall through the cracks. There’s a great discussion on how that can happen, and how important it is to us to link to the right source, in the comment thread on this post (Wurzeltod comes up a lot!):

http://coilhouse.net/2009/04/pleasures-of-the-flesh-fernando-vicente/

We all appreciate Wurzeltod tremendously here. If we ever posted any art in the past that you posted first without a linback to you, I hope you know that it wasn’t malicious. It was either an oversight, or we simply didn’t know that it was you. Your site is a treasure trove of inspiration that comes from a very unique perspective. We’d never intentionally obscure such an incredible source. CH <3 SG

*Fact: this was actually done to me at a children’s hospital in the USSR. Without anesthesia. :(

]]> By: Suzanne http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/comment-page-1/#comment-22827 Suzanne Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:43:44 +0000 http://coilhouse.net/?p=10475#comment-22827 I may be a terribly old fashioned Tumblrista, but a "via" every now and again really wouldn't hurt anyone, ey? ;) I may be a terribly old fashioned Tumblrista, but a “via” every now and again really wouldn’t hurt anyone, ey? ;)

]]> By: Zoe http://coilhouse.net/2009/10/the-photographs-of-roksana-mical/comment-page-1/#comment-22790 Zoe Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:14:10 +0000 http://coilhouse.net/?p=10475#comment-22790 Love these! Particularly fond of the ambiguity of the first one...you're not quite sure what it is, but it's intriguing enough that you want to take a closer look. Love these! Particularly fond of the ambiguity of the first one…you’re not quite sure what it is, but it’s intriguing enough that you want to take a closer look.

]]>